JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
| JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. |
| U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY |
| 1:2021cv02824 |
| October 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Beryl A Howell |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Production of the non-exempt portions of any responsive records due by 2/11/2022; Joint Status Report due by 2/25/2022; summary judgment motions due by 3/31/2022; cross-motion and opposition to motion for summary judgment due by 5/2/2022; opposition to cross-motion and reply to opposition to motion for summary judgment due by 6/1/2022; reply to opposition to cross-motion due by 6/15/2022. (ztg)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER (paperless) ISSUING, upon consideration of the parties' #9 Meet and Confer Statement, the following SCHEDULING ORDER to govern proceedings in this matter: (1) by February 11, 2022, defendant shall complete production of the non-exempt portions of any responsive records; (2) by February 25, 2022, parties shall file a Joint Status Report identifying any disputed issues; (3) by March 31, 2022, defendant shall file any motion for summary judgment; (4) by May 2, 2022, plaintiff shall file any cross-motion for summary judgment and opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment; (5) by June 1, 2022, defendant shall file any opposition to plaintiff's cross-motion and reply in support of its motion for summary judgment; and (6) by June 15, 2022, plaintiff shall file any reply in support of its cross-motion for summary judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on December 20, 2021. (lcbah4)
|
|
Filing 9
MEET AND CONFER STATEMENT. (Snyder, Hilarie)
|
|
Filing 8
ANSWER to Complaint by DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY.(Snyder, Hilarie)
|
|
Filing 7
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY served on 11/1/2021 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Rothstein)(Peterson, James)
|
|
Filing 6
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 11/02/21. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Rothstein)(Peterson, James)
|
|
Filing 5
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 10/28/2021. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 11/27/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Rothstein)(Peterson, James)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on October 26, 2021. (lcbah4)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg)
|
|
Case Assigned to Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell. (znmg)
|
|
Filing 2
LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. (Peterson, James)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8821024) filed by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for US Attorney for DC, #3 Summons for US Attorney General, #4 Summons for U.S. Department of Homeland Security)(Peterson, James)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
