POWELL v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
| WILLIAM E. POWELL |
| INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, JANET YELLEN and CHARLES P. RETTIG |
| 1:2021cv02838 |
| October 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| James E Boasberg |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by WILLIAM E. POWELL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit CONTINUATION, #2 Exhibit)(POWELL, WILLIAM)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's #4 Motion for CM/ECF password is GRANTED provided that Plaintiff follow any requirements imposed by the Clerk's office. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 12/7/2021. (lcjeb2)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for CM/ECF Password by WILLIAM E. POWELL. (ztth)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 11/08/2021. (zsb)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge James E. Boasberg. (zsb)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by WILLIAM E. POWELL. (znmw)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE filed by WILLIAM E. POWELL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(znmw)
|
|
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 10/25/2021. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (znmw)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
