NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
| NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE |
| CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY |
| 1:2021cv02857 |
| October 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| James E Boasberg |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 1/7/2022. (nbn)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING Unopposed #9 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court ORDERS that Defendant shall file its Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by January 7, 2022. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 12/6/2021. (lcjeb2)
|
|
Filing 9
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Quinn, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Anthony Quinn on behalf of All Defendants (Quinn, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 7
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 11/1/2021., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY served on 11/1/2021. (See Docket Entry #6 to view document). (znmw)
|
|
Filing 6
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 11/4/2021. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 12/4/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Jacobs, Hilary)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to U.S. Attorney. (ztth)
|
|
Filing 4
REQUEST for Summons to Issue by NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE. (Jacobs, Hilary); Modified docketing event and text on 10/29/2021 (ztth).
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE. Case related to Case No. 19-cv-529. (Jacobs, Hilary) (Main Document 3 replaced on 11/1/2021) (znmw).
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, )
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge James E. Boasberg. (adh, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8828501) filed by NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(Jacobs, Hilary)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE | |
| Represented By: | Hilary Jacobs |
| Represented By: | John Stephen Guttmann, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Anthony Quinn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
