MCCRAY v. BIDEN
Plaintiff: RONALD C. MCCRAY, JR.
Defendant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR.
Case Number: 1:2021cv02882
Filed: November 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Randolph D Moss
Nature of Suit: Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: For the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, Dkt. #11 , it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, Dkt. #2 , is DENIED; Plaintiff's complaint, Dkt. #1 , is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; and judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant. This Order constitutes a final judgment of the Court within the meaning of Rule 58(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Deputy Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the case. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 12/8/2021. (lcrdm1)
December 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, Dkt. #2 , is DENIED and Plaintiff's complaint, Dkt. #1 is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 12/7/2021. (lcrdm1)
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE by JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR re #8 Memorandum in Opposition (Attachments: #1 Ex. 1 - Declaration of Peter Marks, M.D., #2 Ex. 2 - Declaration of Col. Tonya Rans, MD., #3 Certificate of Service)(DeGenaro, Stephen)
November 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 REPLY to opposition to motion re #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by RONALD C. MCCRAY, JR. (znmw)
November 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Memorandum in opposition to re #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(DeGenaro, Stephen)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Randolph D. Moss: Video (Zoom) Status Conference re: #2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order held on 11/12/2021. Defendant's opposition due 11/17/2021; Plaintiff's Reply due by 11/22/2021. (Court Reporter: Sara Wick.) (kt)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Proposed Order by RONALD C. MCCRAY, JR re #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (znmw)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen DeGenaro on behalf of JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(DeGenaro, Stephen)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTICE of Hearing: Status Conference re: #2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order set for 11/12/2021, at 2:30 PM, by video, before Judge Randolph D. Moss. The Courtroom Deputy Clerk will circulate instructions for connecting remotely.(kt)
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by RONALD C. MCCRAY, JR re #1 Complaint. (znmw)
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NEW Request Regarding Pro Se Consent To Receive Notices of Electronic Filing by RONALD C. MCCRAY, JR (znmw)
November 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 11/2/2021. (lcrdm1)
November 2, 2021 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, Dkt. #2 , it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall immediately cause copies of the summons, the complaint, and the motion for a temporary restraining order to be served on Defendant in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(i)(1) and (2), and, after doing so, shall contact the U.S. Attorney's Office to determine who has been assigned to represent the United States in this matter. As soon as counsel for the United States is identified, Plaintiff and counsel for the United States shall promptly contact the Deputy Courtroom Clerk to set a date for an initial status conference. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 11/2/2021. (lcrdm1)
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by RONALD C. MCCRAY, JR. (znmw)
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 200908) filed by RONALD C. MCCRAY, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(znmw)
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order SUMMONS (3) Issued as to JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (znmw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCCRAY v. BIDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RONALD C. MCCRAY, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR.
Represented By: Stephen DeGenaro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?