STEWART-BEY v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE et al
| CHARLES B. STEWART-BEY |
| UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, QUINCY L. BOOTH and LENNARD JOHNSON |
| 1:2021cv02981 |
| November 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of this Order, the plaintiff shall provide the information described in the attached Order. Failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 11/22/2021. (fb)
|
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Maryland; Case Number 1:21-cv-02763. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Charles B. Stewart(jj2s, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 11/22/2021.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles B. Stewart(jj2s, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 11/22/2021.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Quincy L. Booth, Lennard Johnson, United States Marshals Service, filed by Charles B. Stewart. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jj2s, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 11/22/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
