M. R. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
| M. R. and LINDA RAHAL |
| DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
| 1:2021cv02990 |
| November 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Tanya S Chutkan |
| Robin M Meriweather |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE RANDOMLY REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Robin M. Meriweather for full case management. (zsb) |
MINUTE ORDER OF REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court has determined that this action should be referred to a Magistrate Judge for full case management up to and including issuance of a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive motions, but excluding trial. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this matter is referred to a Magistrate Judge, beginning immediately; the Magistrate Judge will be randomly assigned by the Clerk's Office; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that any future filings related to this matter shall have the initials of the presiding judge and the magistrate judge following the case number in the caption. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 12/11/21. (DJS)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.(Porter, Veronica) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE re #3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Porter, Veronica) |
|
MINUTE ORDER: Before the court is Plaintiffs' #3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Defendant does not oppose this motion. See #3 . Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Motion is hereby GRANTED. It is hereby ordered that the Lab School of Washington is M.R.'s current educational placement and that the District of Columbia must immediately pay for all costs related to M.R.'s attendance at Lab School retroactive to the start of the 2021-22 school year including related services and transportation. The District's payments shall continue and DCPS must maintain M.R.'s placement at Lab School until further order of this Court. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 12/3/21. (DJS)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Response due by 12/3/2021. Reply due by 12/8/2021. (tb) |
|
MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of Plaintiff's #3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, the court hereby directs Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction on or before 3 PM on 12/3. Plaintiff is to file a reply, if needed, on or before 3 PM on 12/8. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 11/29/2021. (lcac)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Veronica A. Porter on behalf of DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Porter, Veronica) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by M. R., LINDA RAHAL. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit 17, #19 Exhibit 18, #20 Exhibit 19)(Eig, Michael) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, District of Columbia Attorney General, and the District of Columbia Mayor. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against District of Columbia ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8861265) filed by M. R., Linda Rahal. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Probert, Meghan) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
