SMARTMATIC USA CORP. et al v. POWELL
| SMARTMATIC USA CORP., SMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDING B.V. and SGO CORPORATION LIMITED |
| SIDNEY POWELL |
| 1:2021cv02995 |
| November 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Carl J Nichols |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Payment for #17 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. ($100; Receipt number ADCDC-9001736). (Joseph, Lawrence)
|
|
Filing 18
NOTICE of Appearance by Howard Kleinhendler on behalf of SIDNEY POWELL (Kleinhendler, Howard)
|
|
The Court having considered Defendant's #17 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Howard Kleinhendler, and it appearing to the Court that the attorney referenced therein meets the requirements for pro hac vice admission under Local Civil Rule 83.2(d), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Howard Kleinhendler is ADMITTED to practice before the Court pro hac vice. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). #Click for instructions Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on December 13, 2021. (lccjn2)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Howard Kleinhendler by SIDNEY POWELL. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Kleinhendler Decl, #2 Text of Proposed Order proposed order)(Joseph, Lawrence) Modified docket event/text on 12/13/2021 (zeg).
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE of Appearance by Lawrence J. Joseph on behalf of SIDNEY POWELL (Joseph, Lawrence)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER. Upon review of the Plaintiffs' #11 Motion to Stay Proceedings, it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Parties shall file a status update within 14 days after the New York State Court issues its decision in Smartmatic USA Corp., et al. v. Fox Corporation, et al., No. 151136/2021 (filed Feb. 4, 2021). Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on November 30, 2021. (lccjn2)
|
|
Filing 15
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by SGO CORPORATION LIMITED, SMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDING B.V., SMARTMATIC USA CORP. re #11 MOTION to Stay . (Tortorella, Lauren)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Appearance by Joel Erik Connolly on behalf of SGO CORPORATION LIMITED, SMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDING B.V., SMARTMATIC USA CORP. (Connolly, Joel)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by Nicole Wrigley on behalf of SGO CORPORATION LIMITED, SMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDING B.V., SMARTMATIC USA CORP. (Wrigley, Nicole)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren Tortorella on behalf of SGO CORPORATION LIMITED, SMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDING B.V., SMARTMATIC USA CORP. (Tortorella, Lauren)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION to Stay by SGO CORPORATION LIMITED, SMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDING B.V., SMARTMATIC USA CORP.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dillingham, Emily)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER. The Court having considered Plaintiffs' #10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Lauren C. Tortorella, and it appearing to the Court that the attorney referenced therein meets the requirements for pro hac vice admission under Local Civil Rule 83.2(d), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Lauren C. Tortorella is ADMITTED to practice before the Court pro hac vice. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). #Click for instructions Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on November 24, 2021. (lccjn2)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER. The Court having considered Plaintiffs' #9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Nicole E. Wrigley, and it appearing to the Court that the attorney referenced therein meets the requirements for pro hac vice admission under Local Civil Rule 83.2(d), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Nicole E. Wrigley is ADMITTED to practice before the Court pro hac vice. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). #Click for instructions Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on November 24, 2021. (lccjn2)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER. The Court having considered Plaintiffs' #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of J. Erik Connolly, and it appearing to the Court that the attorney referenced therein meets the requirements for pro hac vice admission under Local Civil Rule 83.2(d), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that J. Erik Connolly is ADMITTED to practice before the Court pro hac vice. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). #Click for instructions Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on November 24, 2021. (lccjn2)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Lauren C. Tortorella, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-8882900. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by SGO CORPORATION LIMITED, SMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDING B.V., SMARTMATIC USA CORP.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Lauren C. Tortorella, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Dillingham, Emily)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Nicole E. Wrigley, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-8882887. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by SGO CORPORATION LIMITED, SMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDING B.V., SMARTMATIC USA CORP.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Nicole E. Wrigley, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Dillingham, Emily)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- J. Erik Connolly, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-8882827. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by SGO CORPORATION LIMITED, SMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDING B.V., SMARTMATIC USA CORP.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of J. Erik Connolly, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Dillingham, Emily)
|
|
Filing 7
WAIVER OF SERVICE. SIDNEY POWELL waiver sent on 11/16/2021, answer due 1/15/2022. (Dillingham, Emily)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on November 15, 2021. (lccjn2)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to SIDNEY POWELL. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, )
|
|
Filing 4
LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by SGO CORPORATION LIMITED, SMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDING B.V., SMARTMATIC USA CORP. (Dillingham, Emily)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by SGO CORPORATION LIMITED, SMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDING B.V., SMARTMATIC USA CORP.. Case related to Case No. 21-cv-40. (Dillingham, Emily)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Filing Video Exhibits by SGO CORPORATION LIMITED, SMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDING B.V., SMARTMATIC USA CORP. re #1 Complaint,,,,,,,,,,,,, (Dillingham, Emily)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against SIDNEY POWELL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8861853) filed by SMARTMATIC USA CORP., SGO CORPORATION LIMITED, SMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDING B.V.. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit 17, #19 Exhibit 18, #20 Exhibit 19, #21 Exhibit 20, #22 Exhibit 21, #23 Exhibit 22, #24 Exhibit 23, #25 Exhibit 24, #26 Exhibit 25, #27 Exhibit 26, #28 Exhibit 27, #29 Exhibit 28, #30 Exhibit 29, #31 Exhibit 30, #32 Exhibit 31, #33 Exhibit 32, #34 Exhibit 33, #35 Exhibit 34, #36 Exhibit 35, #37 Exhibit 36, #38 Exhibit 37, #39 Exhibit 38, #40 Exhibit 39, #41 Exhibit 40, #42 Exhibit 41, #43 Exhibit 42, #44 Exhibit 43, #45 Exhibit 44, #46 Exhibit 45, #47 Exhibit 46, #48 Exhibit 47, #49 Exhibit 48, #50 Exhibit 49, #51 Exhibit 50, #52 Exhibit 51, #53 Exhibit 52, #54 Exhibit 53, #55 Exhibit 54, #56 Exhibit 55, #57 Exhibit 56, #58 Exhibit 57, #59 Exhibit 58, #60 Exhibit 59, #61 Exhibit 60, #62 Exhibit 61, #63 Exhibit 62, #64 Exhibit 63, #65 Exhibit 64, #66 Exhibit 65, #67 Exhibit 66, #68 Exhibit 67, #69 Exhibit 68, #70 Exhibit 69, #71 Exhibit 70, #72 Exhibit 71, #73 Exhibit 72, #74 Exhibit 73, #75 Exhibit 74, #76 Exhibit 75, #77 Exhibit 76, #78 Exhibit 77, #79 Exhibit 78, #80 Exhibit 79, #81 Exhibit 80, #82 Exhibit 81, #83 Exhibit 82, #84 Exhibit 83, #85 Exhibit 84, #86 Exhibit 85, #87 Exhibit 86, #88 Exhibit 87, #89 Exhibit 88, #90 Exhibit 89, #91 Exhibit 90, #92 Exhibit 91, #93 Exhibit 92, #94 Exhibit 93, #95 Exhibit 94, #96 Exhibit 95, #97 Exhibit 96, #98 Exhibit 97, #99 Exhibit 98, #100 Exhibit 99, #101 Exhibit 100, #102 Exhibit 101, #103 Exhibit 102, #104 Exhibit 103, #105 Exhibit 104, #106 Exhibit 105, #107 Exhibit 106, #108 Exhibit 107, #109 Exhibit 108, #110 Exhibit 109, #111 Exhibit 110, #112 Exhibit 111, #113 Exhibit 112, #114 Exhibit 113, #115 Exhibit 114, #116 Exhibit 115, #117 Exhibit 116, #118 Exhibit 117, #119 Exhibit 118, #120 Exhibit 119, #121 Exhibit 120, #122 Exhibit 121, #123 Exhibit 122, #124 Exhibit 123, #125 Exhibit 124, #126 Exhibit 125, #127 Exhibit 126, #128 Exhibit 127, #129 Exhibit 128, #130 Exhibit 129, #131 Exhibit 130, #132 Exhibit 131, #133 Exhibit 132, #134 Exhibit 133, #135 Exhibit 134, #136 Exhibit 135, #137 Exhibit 136, #138 Exhibit 137, #139 Exhibit 138, #140 Exhibit 139, #141 Exhibit 140, #142 Exhibit 141, #143 Exhibit 142, #144 Exhibit 143, #145 Exhibit 144, #146 Exhibit 145, #147 Exhibit 146, #148 Exhibit 147, #149 Exhibit 148, #150 Exhibit 149, #151 Exhibit 150, #152 Exhibit 151, #153 Exhibit 152, #154 Civil Cover Sheet, #155 Summons)(Dillingham, Emily)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (adh, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
