MABRY v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
| KEVIN DESHAN MABRY |
| STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and CITY OF LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA |
| 1:2021cv03026 |
| November 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint and this civil action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as frivolous. This is a final appealable Order. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 11/22/2021. (fb) Modified on 11/23/2021 to correct docket text. (fb).
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM OPINION. The Court will grant the plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the complaint without prejudice as frivolous.. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 11/22/2021. (fb)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by KEVIN DESHAN MABRY. (znmw)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against CITY OF LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA filed by KEVIN DESHAN MABRY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(znmw)
|
|
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 11/12/2021. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (znmw)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
