KHANAM v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
Plaintiff: NUSRAT KHANAM
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. EMBASSY IN ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN, ANTONY BLINKEN and ANGELA AGGELER
Case Number: 1:2021cv03029
Filed: November 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Amit P Mehta
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2021 Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANGELA AGGELER served on 11/26/2021; ANTONY BLINKEN served on 11/26/2021; U.S. EMBASSY IN ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN served on 11/26/2021; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE served on 11/26/2021, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 11/26/2021., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 11/26/2021. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 1/25/2022.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Hacking, James)
November 16, 2021 Filing 2 SUMMONS (6) Issued Electronically as to ANGELA AGGELER, ANTONY BLINKEN, U.S. EMBASSY IN ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, )
November 16, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANGELA AGGELER, ANTONY BLINKEN, U.S. EMBASSY IN ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8868616) filed by Nusrat Khanam. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons DOS, #3 Summons Embassy, #4 Summons SOS, #5 Summons Ambassador, #6 Summons Att. General, #7 Summons U.S. Att.)(Hacking, James)
November 16, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (adh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KHANAM v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NUSRAT KHANAM
Represented By: James O. Hacking, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. EMBASSY IN ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANTONY BLINKEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANGELA AGGELER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?