JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
| Prince E. Jones |
| DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, TODD PERKINS, RACHEL PULLIAM, DOUGLAS CARLSON, ELBERT GRIFFIN, D.C. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and JODI LAZARUS |
| 1:2021cv03117 |
| November 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Trevor N McFadden |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
Memorandum in opposition to re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by PRINCE E. JONES. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(zeg)
|
|
Filing 20
Memorandum in opposition to re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by PRINCE E. JONES. (zeg)
|
|
Filing 19
LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Prince Jones; Motion This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. "Leave to file DENIED. Plaintiffs requests for discovery are premature because the Court has not yet entered a scheduling order. See U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Pro Se Prisoner Handbook at p. 10 (Discovery does not occur in every case and will not begin until the judge enters a scheduling order.) More, discovery generally shall not be filed with the Court. See D.C. LCvR 5.2(a)". Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 1/14/2022. (zeg)
|
|
Filing 18
LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Prince Jones; Motion This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. "Leave to file DENIED. Plaintiffs requests for discovery are premature because the Court has not yet entered a scheduling order. See U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Pro Se Prisoner Handbook at p. 10 (Discovery does not occur in every case and will not begin until the judge enters a scheduling order.) More, discovery generally shall not be filed with the Court. See D.C. LCvR 5.2(a)". Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 1/14/2022. (zeg)
|
|
Filing 17
LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Prince Jones; Motion This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. "Leave to file DENIED. Plaintiffs requests for discovery are premature because the Court has not yet entered a scheduling order. See U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Pro Se Prisoner Handbook at p. 10 (Discovery does not occur in every case and will not begin until the judge enters a scheduling order.) More, discovery generally shall not be filed with the Court. See D.C. LCvR 5.2(a). ". Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 1/14/2022. (zeg)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER denying Jones's #11 Motion to Appoint Counsel. See attached Order for details. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 1/10/2022. (lctnm3)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff's opposition due by 2/11/2022. Defendants' replies due by 2/18/2022. (hmc)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER denying Plaintiff's #15 Motion to Amend Complaint, Motion to Complete Service of Process. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) provides that the Court may grant leave to file when "justice so requires," but Plaintiff's conclusory filing does not meet this standard. The Court finds no merit in Plaintiff's argument that he has somehow suffered unfairness because the federal government has "raised several claims within [the] Motion to Dismiss which in the D.C. Superior Court Federal Defendant would not have." The Court denies the Motion to Complete Service because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis and the Court, not Plaintiff, is responsible for the issuance of summonses and the execution of service of process. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(d). SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 1/7/2022. (lctnm3)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER granting Plaintiff's #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply. Plaintiff shall file his oppositions to the Federal Government's #5 Motion to Dismiss and the District's #9 Motion to Dismiss on or before February 11, 2022. Defendants shall file any replies to Plaintiff's opposition on or before February 18, 2022. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 1/7/2022. (lctnm3)
|
|
Filing 13
REPLY to opposition to motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by MURIEL BOWSER, DOUGLAS CARLSON, D.C. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ELBERT GRIFFIN, TODD PERKINS, RACHEL PULLIAM. (Daniel, Adam)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to Amend Complaint, MOTION Complete Service of Process by PRINCE E. JONES. (eg)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to #9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by PRINCE E. JONES. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(zeg)
|
|
Filing 12
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM re #1 Notice of Removal (Complaint) filed by PRINCE E. JONES. (zjf)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by PRINCE E. JONES. (znmw)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff's response due by 12/24/2021. (hmc)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER advising Plaintiff to respond to the District Defendants' #9 Motion to Dismiss by December 24, 2021, and warning that if Plaintiff fails to do so without moving for an extension of time the Court may deem the motion conceded. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 12/11/2021. (lctnm3)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by MURIEL BOWSER, DOUGLAS CARLSON, D.C. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ELBERT GRIFFIN, TODD PERKINS, RACHEL PULLIAM. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Daniel, Adam)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Adam Daniel on behalf of MURIEL BOWSER, DOUGLAS CARLSON, D.C. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ELBERT GRIFFIN, TODD PERKINS, RACHEL PULLIAM (Daniel, Adam)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER advising Plaintiff to respond to Defendant Jodi Lazarus's #5 Motion to Dismiss by December 17, 2021, and warning that if Plaintiff fails to do so without moving for an extension of time the Court may deem the motion conceded. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 12/6/2021. (lctnm3)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff's Response to Dispositive Motion due by 12/17/2021. (ztg)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Dismiss by JODI LAZARUS. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Valdivia, Diana)
|
|
Filing 7
Receipt on 11/30/2021 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number 2021 CA 003761 B. (eg)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 11/30/2021. (lctnm3)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal, (adh, )
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (adh, )
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by JODI LAZARUS. Case related to Case No. 20-2797; 16-2261. (Valdivia, Diana)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from D.C. Superior Court, case number 2021 CA 003761 B (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by JODI LAZARUS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (Complaint), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Valdivia, Diana) (Attachment 2 replaced on 11/29/2021) (adh, ). (Attachment 2 replaced on 11/29/2021) (adh, ).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
