SHERDIL v. BLINKEN et al
| ABDULLAH SHERDIL |
| ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, IAN G. BROWNLEE, NATALIE A BAKER, JOHN DOE and ANTONY BLINKEN |
| 1:2021cv03122 |
| November 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Timothy J Kelly |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by ABDULLAH SHERDIL (Jeelani, Hashim) |
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 12/15/2021. (lctjk3)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to NATALIE A BAKER, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, IAN G. BROWNLEE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against NATALIE A BAKER, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, IAN G. BROWNLEE, JOHN DOE, MERRICK B. GARLAND ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8892298) filed by ABDULLAH SHERDIL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT A, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT B, #3 Summons SUMMONS BAKER, #4 Summons SUMMONS BLINKEN, #5 Summons SUMMONS BROWNLEE, #6 Summons SUMMONS ATT GEN, #7 Summons SUMMONS US ATT, #8 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER)(Jeelani, Hashim) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
