KIGHT et al v. CRUNCHY TOBACCO, INC.
Nathan M Kight, Funnels, LLC and NATHAN M. KIGHT |
Crunchy Tobacco, Inc. |
1:2021cv03189 |
December 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by FUNNELS, LLC (Mauro, Thomas) (Main Document 7 replaced on 1/20/2022) (ztth). |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. CRUNCHY TOBACCO, INC. served on 1/19/2022, answer due 2/9/2022 (Mauro, Thomas) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael C. Whitticar on behalf of CRUNCHY TOBACCO, INC. (Whitticar, Michael) |
Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding a patent and/or trademark. (znmw) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to CRUNCHY TOBACCO, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
Filing 2 ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 12/9/21. (DM) |
Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (zsb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Crunchy Tobacco, Inc. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8909839) filed by Nathan M Kight, Funnels, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Crunchy Tobacco, Inc.)(Mauro, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.