OWL FEATHER-GORBEY v. WARDEN FCI BECKLEY, W. VA et al
MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY |
WARDEN FCI BECKLEY, W. VA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
1:2021cv03221 |
December 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Prisoner Petition: General (Habeas Corpus) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Receipt on 01/10/2022 of Electronic Transfer. Other Court Number 5:22-cv-00022 sent by Southern District of West Virginia. (znmg) |
Filing 4 Case transferred to the USDC for the Southern District of West Virginia pursuant to #3 Order Transferring Pro Se Case. Sent to Court via extraction. (znmg) |
Filing 3 ORDER TRANSFERRING PRO SE CASE to the USDC for the Southern District of West Virginia. Whether Petitioner should proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination for the receiving court. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Transfer due by 1/5/2022. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 12/16/2021. (ztnr) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY. (znmw) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(znmw) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 12/7/2021. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (znmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.