HIGHT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
| MATTHEW J. HIGHT |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES COAST GUARD, ADMIRAL KARL L SCHULTZ and KARL L. SCHULTZ |
| 1:2021cv03277 |
| December 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amit P Mehta |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to KARL L. SCHULTZ, UNITED STATES COAST GUARD, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, )
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (zsb)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER. This newly filed case is not "related" to Hight v. Dept of Homeland Security, 19-cv-2094 (APM), because the earlier case is no longer "pending on the merits in the District Court." LCvR 57.12(a)(3). The court entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff in the earlier case and remanded it to the agency. Hight, 19-cv-2094, ECF Nos. 77, 78. Accordingly, this case shall be returned to the Calendar Committee for re-assignment. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 12/22/2021. (lcapm1)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by MATTHEW J. HIGHT. Case related to Case No. 19-cv-02094 (APM). (Redfern, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 4
REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by MATTHEW J. HIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Summons U.S. Coast Guard by way of Matthew M. Graves, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, #2 Summons U.S. Department of Homeland Security by way of Matthew M. Graves, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, #3 Summons Admiral Karl L. Schultz by way of Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General, #4 Summons U.S. Coast Guard by way of Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General, #5 Summons U.S. Department of Homeland Security by way of Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General)(Redfern, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 3
ERRATA by MATTHEW J. HIGHT re #1 Complaint, filed by MATTHEW J. HIGHT. (Redfern, Jeffrey)
|
|
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to jredfern@ij.org, cc'd 6 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata., 2. Missing summonses-government. When naming a government agent or agency as a defendant, you must supply a summons for each defendant & two additional summonses for the U.S. Attorney & U.S. Attorney General. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to Issue., 3. Missing Related Case form. Please submit using the event Notice of Related Case., 4. Pleading filed as attachment. Please file pleading as separate entry., 5. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zsb, )
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Johnson on behalf of MATTHEW J. HIGHT (Johnson, Robert)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8930171) filed by MATTHEW J. HIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Related Case Form, #3 Summons Admiral Karl L. Schultz, #4 Summons U.S. Coast Guard, #5 Summons U.S. Department of Homeland Security)(Redfern, Jeffrey)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
