GALLO v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
| ALEXANDER GALLO |
| DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
| 1:2021cv03298 |
| December 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Trevor N McFadden |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
MOTION to Strike #9 Reply to opposition to Motion by ALEXANDER GALLO. (zeg)
|
|
Filing 9
REPLY to opposition to motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Bluming, Micah)
|
|
Filing 8
Memorandum in opposition to re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by ALEXANDER GALLO. (zeg)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff's response due by 2/1/2022. (hmc)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER advising Plaintiff to respond by February 1, 2022, and warning that if Plaintiff fails to do so without moving for an extension of time the Court may deem Defendant's #6 Motion to Dismiss conceded. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 1/18/2022. (lctnm3)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Bluming, Micah)
|
|
Filing 5
Receipt on 1/6/2022 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number 2021 CA 004322 B. (eg)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer to the Complaint due by 1/18/2022. (ztg)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 12/21/2021. (lctnm3)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal, (zsb)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (zsb)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER granting the District's #2 Consent Motion for Extension of Time. The District must respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before January 18, 2022. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 12/21/2021. (lctnm3)
|
|
Filing 2
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Bluming, Micah)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the District of Columbia, case number 2021 CA 004322 B (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Attachments: #1 Documents from Superior Court, #2 Documents from Superior Court, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Service)(Bluming, Micah)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GALLO v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ALEXANDER GALLO | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | |
| Represented By: | Micah Ian Bluming |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
