COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION v. FIRST STATE DEPOSITORY, LLC et al
| COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION |
| ARGENT ASSET GROUP LLC and FIRST STATE DEPOSITORY, LLC |
| 1:2021mc00048 |
| May 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| James E Boasberg |
| G Michael Harvey |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). #Click for in structions. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey on 6/28/21. (MFB)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- David S. Slovick, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-8559236. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by ARGENT ASSET GROUP LLC, FIRST STATE DEPOSITORY, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of David S. Slovick, #2 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Adenrele, Adeyemi) |
| Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 MOTION to Enforce filed by COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey on 6/23/21. (MFB) |
| Filing 10 SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBIT by COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION re #7 Reply to Document, filed by COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION. (znmw) (znmw). |
|
MINUTE ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to File. Petitioner has filed a motion for leave to file a supplemental exhibit to its reply. ECF No. 8. Respondents do not object to the inclusion of the proposed exhibit in the record before the Court, but do object to the extent that th[e] motion [accompanying it] is a sur-reply or include[s] additional facts, argument or case law beyond those argued in the Reply. Id. at 1 (third alteration in original). The Court has reviewed the supplemental exhibit and the brief accompanying it and finds that the brief neither constitutes a sur-reply nor includes additional factual or legal arguments beyond those included in Petitioners reply. Rather, the submission describes the supplemental exhibit, which was already referred to in Petitioners reply (see ECF No. 7 at 14), and explains why it supports arguments already made in that reply (ECF No. 8 at 2). Moreover, the exhibit was not attached to the reply only to give Respondents the opportunity to review it to determine if it included any privileged or protected information. ECF No. 8 at 2. That review has been completed and it does not. Id. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioners motion for leave to file a supplementary exhibit (ECF No. 8) is GRANTED, and the exhibit and its accompanying brief shall be deemed filed as of the date of this Minute Order. SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey on 6/10/21. (MFB)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File a Supplemental Exhibit to Its Reply by COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Hunt, Brian) |
| Filing 7 REPLY re #1 IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENAS filed by COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Karen Stewart and Exhibit, #2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Michael Loconte and Exhibits)(Hunt, Brian) Modified to add link on 6/10/2021 (znmw). |
|
MINUTE ORDER. In light of Respondents' response to this Court's Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 6), Petitioner is hereby ORDERED to file a reply to that response on or before June 3, 2021. In addition, the parties are reminded of their right to litigate their case by consent before a United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. 636(c); Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; LCvR 73.1. A final judgment by a Magistrate Judge in consent matters may be appealed directly to the United States Court of Appeals like any other judgment of this Court. See LCvR 73.1. A Magistrate Judge may exercise this authority only if all parties voluntarily consent. Parties may consent by executing the Notice of Consent form available at https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/sites/dcd/files/ConsentMagJudge2017FILL.pdf and submitting it to the Clerk of the United States District Court only. The parties are free to withhold their consent without risk of adverse consequences. Replies due by 6/3/2021. SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey on 5/27/21. (MFB)
|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by ARGENT ASSET GROUP LLC, FIRST STATE DEPOSITORY, LLC re #3 Order to Show Cause filed by ARGENT ASSET GROUP LLC, FIRST STATE DEPOSITORY, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Adenrele, Adeyemi) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Adeyemi Adenrele on behalf of ARGENT ASSET GROUP LLC, FIRST STATE DEPOSITORY, LLC (Adenrele, Adeyemi) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION . (Hunt, Brian) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. See Order for details. Show Cause Response due by 5/26/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey on 5/12/21. (MFB)
|
| CASE RANDOMLY REFERRED to Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey for full case management. (zsb) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER OF REFERRAL for full case management. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 5/6/2021. (lcjeb2)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION to Enforce Administrative Subpoena (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Application for an Order to Show Cause and an Order Requiring Compliance with Administrative Subpoenas, #2 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Michael Loconte and Exhibits Thereto, #3 Text of Proposed Order to Show Cause, #4 Text of Proposed Order Requiring Compliance with Administrative Subpoenas)(Hunt, Brian) Modified on 5/5/2021 to correct docket entry text (zsb). |
| Case Assigned to Judge James E. Boasberg. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
