FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. PLATINUM PLUS PRINTING, LLC
| FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION |
| PLATINUM PLUS PRINTING, LLC |
| 1:2021mc00092 |
| June 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Randolph D Moss |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons given in the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court hereby GRANTS the Commission's Petition for an Order Enforcing Subpoena Duces Tecum and ORDERS that Platinum Plus Printing, LLC, respond in full to the pending subpoena on or before August 13, 2021. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 08/03/2021. (lcrdm1) Modified on 8/3/2021 to change document type to "opinion" and add "Memorandum Opinion and Order" to docket entry text (kt).
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: In light of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order granting the Commission's Petition for an Order Enforcing Subpoena Duces Tecum, Dkt. #9 , the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this case. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 08/03/2021. (lcrdm1)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Randolph D. Moss: Show Cause Hearing/Motion Hearing held on 7/26/2021 re: #1 MOTION to Enforce filed by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Show cause satisfied; Motion TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. (Court Reporter: Nancy Meyer.) (kt)
|
|
Reset Hearings: Motion Hearing reset for 7/26/2021, at 4:00 PM, by telephone, before Judge Randolph D. Moss. (kt)
|
|
Filing 8
REPLY to opposition to motion re #5 MOTION Respondent's Opposition to FTC Petition re #1 MOTION to Enforce filed by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. (Kappler, Burke)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of the FTC's motion to enforce, Dkt. #1 , and Respondent's opposition, Dkt. #5 , it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall appear telephonically for oral argument on the motion at 10:00 a.m. on July 26, 2021. The parties may obtain a teleconference number and access code from the Deputy Clerk. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 07/21/2021. (lcrdm1)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa Lamm Bachman on behalf of PLATINUM PLUS PRINTING, LLC (Lamm Bachman, Lisa)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Lisa M. Lamm Bachman, Dkt. #6 , it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Lisa M. Lamm Bachman is hereby granted leave to appear pro hac vice in this case. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to to LCvR 83.6(a)/LCrR 44.5(a). #Click for Instructions. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 07/16/2021. (lcrdm1)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Lisa M. Lamm Bachman, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-8603327. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by PLATINUM PLUS PRINTING, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Wagman, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM in Opposition to FTC Petition re #1 MOTION to Enforce by PLATINUM PLUS PRINTING, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Wagman, Matthew) Modified text on 7/16/2021 (ztd).
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Service by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email, July 1, 2021, #2 Exhibit 2d email, July 1, 2021, #3 Exhibit Letter, July 2, 2021, #4 Exhibit FedEx Delivery Confirmation, July 6, 2021)(Kappler, Burke)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: In light of the Federal Trade Commission's motion to enforce, Dkt. #1 , it is hereby ORDERED that the Respondent shall appear telephonially on July 26, 2021 at 4:00 p.m. to show cause, if any there be, why the Court should not enter an order compelling compliance with the Commission's subpoena. It is further ORDERED that Respondent file its opposition materials, if any, on or before July 15, 2021, and that the Commission reply on or before July 22, 2021. Parties may obtain a teleconference number and access code from the Deputy Clerk. See attached order for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 07/01/2021. (lcrdm1)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Michele Arington on behalf of FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (Arington, Michele)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION to Enforce by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(ztd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. PLATINUM PLUS PRINTING, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | |
| Represented By: | Burke W. Kappler |
| Represented By: | Michele Arington |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: PLATINUM PLUS PRINTING, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Lisa M. Lamm Bachman |
| Represented By: | Matthew T. Wagman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
