ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC et al C v. R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY et al
ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and U.S. SMOKELESS TOBACCO COMPANY LLC |
R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY and MODORAL BRANDS, INC. |
JUUL LABS, INC. |
1:2021mc00103 |
July 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Rudolph Contreras |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File its Opposition to the Motion to Compel (Sixth Motion) by JUUL LABS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Barmak, David) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #9 JUUL Labs, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time: It is hereby ORDERED that JUUL Labs, Inc. shall submit its opposition to #1 R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company and Modoral Brands, Inc.'s Motion to Compel on or before September 29, 2021; and R.J. Reynolds shall submit any reply on or before October 6, 2021. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 09/20/21.(lcrc1) |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File its Opposition to the Motion to Compel (Fifth Motion) by JUUL LABS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Barmak, David) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #8 JUUL Labs, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time: It is hereby ORDERED that JUUL Labs, Inc. shall submit its opposition to #1 R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company and Modoral Brands, Inc.'s Motion to Compel on or before September 22, 2021; and R.J. Reynolds shall submit any reply on or before September 29, 2021. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 09/13/2021. (lcrc2) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Response to Motion to Compel due by 9/15/2021. (zgdf) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #7 JUUL Labs, Inc.'s Unopposed Fourth Motion for an Extension of Time. It is hereby ORDERED that JUUL Labs, Inc. shall file its opposition to R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company and Modoral Brands, Inc.'s ("RJR") Motion to Compel Production of Information by JUUL Labs, Inc. on or before September 15, 2021, and RJR shall file any reply on or before September 22, 2021. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 9/7/2021. (lcrc3) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File its Opposition to the Motion to Compel (Fourth Motion) by JUUL LABS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Barmak, David) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 11/8/2021; Replies due by 9/15/2021. (tj) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #6 JUUL Labs, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time: It is hereby ORDERED that JUUL Labs, Inc. shall submit its opposition to #1 R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company and Modoral Brands, Inc.'s Motion to Compel on or before September 8, 2021; and R.J. Reynolds shall submit any reply on or before September 15, 2021. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 8/19/2021. (lcrc1) |
Filing 6 Third MOTION for Extension of Time to File its Opposition to the Motion to Compel (Unopposed) by JUUL LABS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Barmak, David) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Opposition due by 8/25/2021; Replies due by 9/1/2021. (tj) |
Filing 5 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File its Opposition to the Motion to Compel (Unopposed) by JUUL LABS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Barmak, David) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #5 JUUL Labs, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time: It is hereby ORDERED that JUUL Labs, Inc. shall submit its opposition to #1 R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company and Modoral Brands, Inc.'s Motion to Compel on or before August 25, 2021; and R.J. Reynolds shall submit any reply on or before September 1, 2021. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 8/12/2021. (lcrc1) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #3 JUUL Labs, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time: It is hereby ORDERED the deadline in the Court's order dated August 6, 2021, is VACATED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that JUUL Labs, Inc. shall submit its opposition to #1 R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company and Modoral Brands, Inc.'s Motion to Compel on or before August 18, 2021; and R.J. Reynolds shall submit any reply on or before August 25, 2021. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 8/7/2021. (lcrc1) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #3 JUUL Labs, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time: It is hereby ORDERED that JUUL Labs, Inc. shall submit its opposition to #1 R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company and Modoral Brands, Inc.'s Motion to Compel on or before August 25, 2021. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 8/6/2021. (lcrc1) |
Filing 4 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by JUUL Labs, Inc. (Barmak, David) |
Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File its Opposition to the Motion to Compel by JUUL Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Barmak, David) |
Filing fee received: $ 49.00, receipt number: 200319. (ztth) |
Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY AND MODORAL BRANDS, INC. identifying Corporate Parent REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC., Corporate Parent BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO P.L.C., Corporate Parent LOUISVILLE SECURITIES LIMITED, Corporate Parent MODORAL BRANDS, INC., Corporate Parent MODORAL, Corporate Parent REYNOLDS AMERICAN, Corporate Parent BATUS HOLDINGS INC., Corporate Parent BATUS HOLDINGS' for R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY AND MODORAL BRANDS, INC. (ztth) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Compel filed by R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY AND MODORAL BRANDS, INC. (ztth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.