AMPERSAND PUBLISHING, LLC v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
| AMPERSAND PUBLISHING, LLC |
| NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD |
| GRAPHICS COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS |
| 1:2021mc00140 |
| November 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| G Michael Harvey |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
MOTION for an Order Referring Case to Special Master by NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. (ztth)
|
|
Filing 3
RESPONSE re #2 Petition filed by AMPERSAND PUBLISHING, LLC. (ztth)
|
|
Filing 2
PETITION by NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD as to #1 USCA Order, USCA Case Number 15-1074. (ztth) Modified DATE FILED on 11/10/2021 (ztth).
|
|
Filing 1
USCA ORDER (USCA Case Number 15-1074 Consolidated with 31CA028589, 31CA028661, 31CA028667, 31CA028700, 31CA028733, 31CA028734, 31CA028738, 31CA028799, 31CA028889, 31CA028890, 31CA028944, 31CA029032, 31CA029076, 31CA029099, 31CA029124) ORDERED that the motion for an order referring case to a Special Master be granted and that the Honorable G. Michael Harvey, United States Magistrate Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia be, and hereby is, appointed Special Master. (See Order for full details). (ztth)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
