SCAVINO v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Plaintiff: PLAINTIFF and DANIEL J. SCAVINO, JR.
Defendant: VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00018
Filed: January 5, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Dabney L Friedrich
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDARD ORDER for Civil Cases. See text for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on February 10, 2022. (lcdlf2)
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsb)
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (zsb)
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 COMPLAINT against VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by PLAINTIFF. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Woodward, Stanley)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING plaintiff's #3 Motion to Proceed Anonymously. See Order for further details. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on January 19, 2022. (lcbah4)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for leave to proceed anonymously by PLAINTIFF. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Woodward, Stanley)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by PLAINTIFF.(Woodward, Stanley)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to stanley@brandwoodwardlaw.com, cc'd 2 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Pseudonym Request e-filed without leave of court. Please submit motion using the event Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym. In the future, do not file these kinds of cases electronically., 2. Missing/incorrect summonses. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to issue., 3. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zsb, )
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 STRICKEN PURSUANT TO #4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FILED 01/19/2022.....COMPLAINT against PLAINTIFF ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8960447) filed by PLAINTIFF. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Woodward, Stanley) Modified on 1/20/2022 (zsb).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SCAVINO v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PLAINTIFF
Represented By: Stanley Edmund Woodward, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DANIEL J. SCAVINO, JR.
Represented By: Stanley Edmund Woodward, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?