LABIBI et al v. BLINKEN
Plaintiff: HEDIEH LABIBI and AMIR MOHAMMAD REZA A KHALIL
Defendant: ANTONY BLINKEN
Case Number: 1:2022cv00033
Filed: January 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Florence Y Pan
Nature of Suit: Immigration: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr on behalf of All Defendants (Molina, Ernesto)
February 9, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by David Kim on behalf of ANTONY BLINKEN (Kim, David)
February 6, 2022 NOTICE OF ERROR re #4 Summons Returned Executed as to US Attorney; emailed to curtis@morrisonurena.com, cc'd 2 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. DO NOT REFILE - Counsel is reminded to docket all parts of their filing (zjf, )
February 4, 2022 Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANTONY BLINKEN served on 2/1/2022. (See Docket Entry #4 to view document) (zjf)
February 4, 2022 Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 2/1/2022. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 4/2/2022.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 2/1/2022. (Morrison, Curtis)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Florence Y. Pan on 1/10/2022. (lcrl)
January 10, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY BLINKEN, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg)
January 10, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Florence Y. Pan. (znmg)
January 6, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against ANTONY BLINKEN ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8965037) filed by HEDIEH LABIBI, AMIR MOHAMMAD REZA A KHALIL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Summons ANTONY BLINKEN, #10 Summons MERRICK GARLAND, #11 Summons US ATTORNEY, #12 Civil Cover Sheet)(Morrison, Curtis)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LABIBI et al v. BLINKEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HEDIEH LABIBI
Represented By: Curtis Lee Morrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AMIR MOHAMMAD REZA A KHALIL
Represented By: Curtis Lee Morrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANTONY BLINKEN
Represented By: David Kim
Represented By: Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?