GONZALEZ FERNANDEZ et al v. BLINKEN et al
| YENISLEIDY GONZALEZ FERNANDEZ, RAMON RODRIGUEZ ALVAREZ and RAMON RODRIGUEZ CORDERO |
| ANTONY BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR and ERIC S. COHAN |
| 1:2022cv00046 |
| January 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Royce C Lamberth |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: Document No. re #9 Certificate of Service was entered in error and counsel was instructed to refile said pleading using the "SERVICE OF PROCESS" event. (zjf) |
| Filing 9 ENTERED IN ERROR.....CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by YENISLEIDY GONZALEZ FERNANDEZ, RAMON RODRIGUEZ ALVAREZ, RAMON RODRIGUEZ CORDERO . (Casazza, Christopher) Modified on 3/6/2022 (zjf). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Siu Wong on behalf of All Defendants (Wong, Siu) (Main Document 8 replaced on 2/17/2022) (zjf). (Main Document 8 replaced on 2/23/2022) (znmw). |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to RENA BITTER, ANTONY BLINKEN, ERIC S. COHAN, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR. (zjf) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr on behalf of All Defendants (Molina, Ernesto) |
| Filing 5 ENTERED IN ERROR.....NOTICE of Appearance by Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr on behalf of All Defendants (Molina, Ernesto) Modified on 2/10/2022 (zjf). |
| NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: Document No. re #5 Notice of Appearance was entered in error and refiled by counsel. (See Docket Entry #6 to view document)(zjf) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE Corrected per Clerk Instruction filed by YENISLEIDY GONZALEZ FERNANDEZ, RAMON RODRIGUEZ CORDERO, RAMON RODRIGUEZ ALVAREZ.(Casazza, Christopher) |
| NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: Document Nos. re #2 Summons Issued Electronically as to USA,, Summons Issued Electronically as to AUSA, #3 Summons Returned Executed as to US Attorney, was entered in error and counsel was instructed to refile said pleading using the correct summons form (21/60). (zjf) |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #3 Summons Returned Executed as to US Attorney; emailed to chris@piclaw.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Document incomplete/illegible, 2. Please refile document, 3. As to the USAG & Federal Dfts. (zjf, ) |
| Filing 3 ENTERED IN ERROR.....RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 1/26/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 3/27/2022. (Casazza, Christopher) Modified on 2/8/2022 (zjf). |
| Filing 2 ENTERED IN ERROR.....SUMMONS (6) Issued Electronically as to RENA BITTER, ANTONY BLINKEN, ERIC S. COHAN, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (rj) (Main Document 2 replaced on 1/18/2022) (rj). Modified on 1/18/2022 to attach Notice, Consent and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge and to correct docket text (rj). Modified on 2/8/2022 (zjf). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Royce C. Lamberth. (zsb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RENA BITTER, ANTONY BLINKEN, ERIC S. COHAN, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8967126) filed by YENISLEIDY GONZALEZ FERNANDEZ, RAMON RODRIGUEZ CORDERO, RAMON RODRIGUEZ ALVAREZ. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Casazza, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
