KIECK v. BLINKEN et al
| CARL LOUIS KIECK |
| ANTONY BLINKEN, MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, RICHARD C. VISEK, TODD P. HASKELL and VINCENT SPERA |
| 1:2022cv00061 |
| January 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Florence Y Pan |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by CARL LOUIS KIECK (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Florence Y. Pan on 1/11/2022. (lcrl)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (9) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Florence Y. Pan. (znmg) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against ANTONY BLINKEN, MERRICK GARLAND, TODD P. HASKELL, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, VINCENT SPERA, RICHARD C. VISEK, CHRISTOPHER WRAY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8971310) filed by CARL LOUIS KIECK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
