WALKER v. KENDALL
TONY A. WALKER |
FRANK KENDALL |
TONY WALKER |
1:2022cv00119 |
January 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Beryl A Howell |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on January 27, 2022. (lcbah1) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to FRANK KENDALL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsb) |
Filing 2 ERRATA by TONY A. WALKER re #1 Complaint, filed by TONY A. WALKER. (Fischer, Morris) |
Case Assigned to Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell. (zsb) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to morris@mfischerlaw.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zsb, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TONY WALKER with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8986519) filed by TONY WALKER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Air Force, #4 Summons Attorney General, #5 Summons U.S. Attorney)(Fischer, Morris) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.