BRIEHL et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
DANIEL BRIEHL and GARY CROSS |
IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN |
1:2022cv00158 |
January 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
John D Bates |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF CLERK of mailing one copy of the summons, complaint, and notice of suit, together with a translation of each into the official language of the foreign state on 2/10/2022, by registered mail, return receipt requested, to the head of the ministry of foreign affairs, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1608(a)(3). (zeg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/15/2022: #1 Registered Mail Receipts) (znmw). |
Filing 8 REQUEST from DANIEL BRIEHL, GARY CROSS for the Clerk to effect service of one copy of the summons, complaint, and notice of suit, together with a translation of each into the official language of the foreign state, by registered mail, return receipt requested, to the head of the ministry of foreign affairs, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1608(a)(3). (zeg) |
Filing 7 SEALED DOCUMENT filed by DANIEL BRIEHL, GARY CROSS(This document is SEALED and only available to authorized persons.)(Perry, Amanda) |
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT REQUESTING FOREIGN MAILING on Iranian Ministry of Information and Security by DANIEL BRIEHL, GARY CROSS. (Perry, Amanda) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT REQUESTING FOREIGN MAILING on Islamic Republic of Iran by DANIEL BRIEHL, GARY CROSS. (Perry, Amanda) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Full of names and address to be filed under seal by 2/28/2022. (tb) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(rj) |
MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of #3 plaintiffs' motion for waiver of local civil rule, and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that Local Civil Rule 5.1(c)'s requirement that plaintiffs include their "full residence address[es]" on the Complaint's caption is hereby WAIVED; it is further ORDERED that plaintiffs shall file under seal a list containing the names and residence addresses of all plaintiffs by not later than February 28, 2022; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall accept #1 the Complaint and issue process directed to defendants. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 1/27/2022. (lcjdb2) |
Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (zsb) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Waiver of Local Civil Rule 5.1(e) by DANIEL BRIEHL. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Perry, Amanda) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to amanda.perry@faylawgroup.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zsb, ) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by All Plaintiffs. (zsb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8998565) filed by DANIEL BRIEHL, GARY CROSS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Related Case Form, #3 Summons Iran, #4 Summons MOIS)(Perry, Amanda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.