CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY |
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS |
1:2022cv00190 |
January 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Timothy J Kelly |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MINUTE ORDER granting Defendant's #8 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint. It is hereby ORDERED, for good cause shown, that Defendant's #8 Consent Motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the #5 Amended Complaint by April 6, 2022. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 03/11/2022. (lctjk2) |
Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. (Tepe, Sean) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Sean Michael Tepe on behalf of U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (Tepe, Sean) |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 2/14/2022. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 3/16/2022.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 2/14/2022., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS served on 2/14/2022 (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service Attachment A)(Lopes, Paulo) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY.(Lopes, Paulo) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by William John Snape, III on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Snape, William) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly. (zsb) |
Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY (zsb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9006714) filed by CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Attorney General, #3 Summons U.S. Attorney, #4 Summons U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, #5 Exhibit Corporate Disclosure)(Lopes, Paulo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY | |
Represented By: | Paulo Antonio Lopes |
Represented By: | William John Snape, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | |
Represented By: | Sean Michael Tepe |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.