CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Case Number: 1:2022cv00190
Filed: January 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Timothy J Kelly
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER granting Defendant's #8 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint. It is hereby ORDERED, for good cause shown, that Defendant's #8 Consent Motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the #5 Amended Complaint by April 6, 2022. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 03/11/2022. (lctjk2)
March 10, 2022 Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. (Tepe, Sean)
March 9, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Sean Michael Tepe on behalf of U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (Tepe, Sean)
March 7, 2022 Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 2/14/2022. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 3/16/2022.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 2/14/2022., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS served on 2/14/2022 (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service Attachment A)(Lopes, Paulo)
March 3, 2022 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY.(Lopes, Paulo)
March 1, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by William John Snape, III on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Snape, William)
February 2, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, )
January 31, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly. (zsb)
January 27, 2022 Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY (zsb)
January 27, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9006714) filed by CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Attorney General, #3 Summons U.S. Attorney, #4 Summons U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, #5 Exhibit Corporate Disclosure)(Lopes, Paulo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Represented By: Paulo Antonio Lopes
Represented By: William John Snape, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Represented By: Sean Michael Tepe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?