HARLEY v. KENNEY et al
| EBONY HARLEY |
| JAMES KENNEY, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, JARRETT MATTHEWS JONAS and LEGAL SHIELD |
| 1:2022cv00211 |
| January 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Case transferred to the USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania pursuant to #3 Order Transferring Pro Se Case. Sent to Court via extraction. (znmg) |
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSFERRING PRO SE CASE to the USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Transfer due by 3/14/2022. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 02/22/2022. (znmg)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by EBONY HARLEY. (znmw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS(Hospital and Medical Center), DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS(Nurses and Social Workers), JARRETT MATTHEWS JONAS, JAMES KENNEY, LEGAL SHIELD with Jury Demand filed by EBONY HARLEY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(znmw) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 1/26/2022. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (znmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
