CHEN et al v. BIDEN et al
BING CHEN and PACIFIC RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INSTITUTE |
JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR., MIKE POMPEO and ANTONY BLINKEN |
1:2022cv00239 |
January 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION accompanying #4 Order. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 2/2/2022. (lcckk3) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying #2 Emergency Motion for Order to Stop Diplomatic Boycott; denying #3 Second Emergency Motion for Order to Stop Diplomatic Boycott; dismissing this case. The Clerk of Court is instructed to mail a copy of this Order and the accompanying Memorandum Opinion to Plaintiff's address of record. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 2/2/2022. (lcckk3) |
Filing 3 Second Emergency MOTION for Order to Stop Diplomatic Boycott by BING CHEN. (znmw) |
Filing 2 Emergency MOTION for Order to Stop Diplomatic Boycott by BING CHEN. (znmw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR, ANTONY BLINKEN, MIKE POMPEO ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 201470) with Jury Demand filed by BING CHEN, PACIFIC RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INSTITUTE. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(znmw) |
SUMMONS Not Issued as to JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR, ANTONY BLINKEN, MIKE POMPEO (znmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.