FIRST ADVANTAGE ENTERPRISE SCREENING CORPORATION v. INTERNATIONAL GOLDEN FOODS, LLC
Plaintiff: FIRST ADVANTAGE ENTERPRISE SCREENING CORPORATION
Defendant: INTERNATIONAL GOLDEN FOODS, LLC
Case Number: 1:2022cv00255
Filed: February 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE. INTERNATIONAL GOLDEN FOODS, LLC waiver sent on 2/4/2022, answer due 4/5/2022. (Hochman Rothell, Bonnie)
March 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Rule 4(m) ORDER on Service. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 3/31/22. (lcckk3)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 2/4/2022. (DM)
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to INTERNATIONAL GOLDEN FOODS, LLC. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg)
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (znmg)
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ERRATA by FIRST ADVANTAGE ENTERPRISE SCREENING CORPORATION re #1 Complaint, filed by FIRST ADVANTAGE ENTERPRISE SCREENING CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Corrected Complaint)(Hochman Rothell, Bonnie)
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to bhrothell@mmmlaw.com, cc'd 6 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (znmg, )
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by FIRST ADVANTAGE ENTERPRISE SCREENING CORPORATION identifying Corporate Parent FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION for FIRST ADVANTAGE ENTERPRISE SCREENING CORPORATION. (znmg)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9017051) filed by FIRST ADVANTAGE ENTERPRISE SCREENING CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Summons, #10 Certificate Rule LCvR 26.1)(Hochman Rothell, Bonnie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FIRST ADVANTAGE ENTERPRISE SCREENING CORPORATION v. INTERNATIONAL GOLDEN FOODS, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FIRST ADVANTAGE ENTERPRISE SCREENING CORPORATION
Represented By: Bonnie Y. Hochman Rothell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INTERNATIONAL GOLDEN FOODS, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?