HARRIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
| DAVID HARRIS |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and MEDICAL STAFF FOR THE BUREAU OF PRISONS |
| 1:2022cv00342 |
| February 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER directing an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $20.83 from Prison Account of DAVID HARRIS and granting MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (see order for full details). Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 02/21/2022. (znmg)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by DAVID HARRIS. (znmg) |
| Filing 4 Consent to Proceed before US Magistrate Judge for All Purposes by DAVID HARRIS.. (znmg) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT for period of six months by DAVID HARRIS (znmg) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DAVID HARRIS. (znmg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MEDICAL STAFF FOR THE BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA filed by DAVID HARRIS. (Attachment: #1 Summons)(znmg) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 2/7/2022. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (znmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
