BREWER v. WRAY et al
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER |
CHRISTOPHER WRAY, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JANET YELLEN, MERRICK GARLAND, AVRIL HAINES, CITY OF NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, ERNEST HART, WILLIAM BURNS and JOHN DOES 1-99 |
1:2022cv00365 |
February 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. (See order for full details) Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 02/23/2022. (znmg) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by DENNIS SHELDON BREWER. (znmg) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DENNIS SHELDON BREWER. (znmg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by DENNIS SHELDON BREWER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(znmg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/16/2022: #5 Exhibit) (znmg). |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 02/07/2022. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (znmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.