SPARACINO PLLC v. DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY
SPARACINO PLLC |
DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY |
1:2022cv00466 |
February 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Timothy J Kelly |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER: Before the Court in this FOIA case are a complaint and an answer. It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall meet, confer, and file a joint proposed schedule for briefing or disclosure by May 3, 2022. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 4/5/2022. (lctjk1) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Joint Proposed Briefing Schedule due by 5/3/2022. (zkh) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY.(Simon, Jeremy) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Devin Charles Ringger on behalf of SPARACINO PLLC (Ringger, Devin) (Main Document 8 replaced on 3/28/2022) (ztth). |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas M.H. Reddick on behalf of SPARACINO PLLC (Reddick, Nicholas) (Main Document 7 replaced on 3/28/2022) (ztth). |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 3/2/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 4/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Gottlieb, Michael) |
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 3/2/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Gottlieb, Michael) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY served on 3/1/2022 (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Gottlieb, Michael) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(ztth) |
Case Assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly. (zsb) |
Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by SPARACINO PLLC (Gottlieb, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Violation of the Freedom of Information Act against DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9058881) filed by SPARACINO PLLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons To Defense Health Agency, #3 Summons to Civil Process Clerk - US Attorney's Office, #4 Summons US Attorney General, #5 Exhibit 1, #6 Exhibit 2)(Gottlieb, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SPARACINO PLLC v. DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SPARACINO PLLC | |
Represented By: | Michael J. Gottlieb |
Represented By: | Devin Charles Ringger |
Represented By: | Nicholas M.H. Reddick |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY | |
Represented By: | Jeremy S. Simon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.