ALLIED TELECOM GROUP, LLC v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
| ALLIED TELECOM GROUP, LLC and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
| 1:2022cv00653 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Carl J Nichols |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Rave, Helen)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the Defendant's #6 Consent Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint is April 29, 2022. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on April 5, 2022. (lccjn1)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Micah Ian Bluming on behalf of DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Bluming, Micah)
|
|
Filing 6
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Rave, Helen)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Helen Marie Rave on behalf of DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Rave, Helen)
|
|
Filing 4
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the District of Columbia Attorney General. Date of Service Upon District of Columbia Attorney General 3/18/2022. Answer due for ALL D.C. DEFENDANTS by 4/8/2022. (Tolchin, Edward)
|
|
Filing 3
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on the Mayor of the District of Columbia. Date of Service Upon the Mayor for the District of Columbia on 03/18/2022., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the District of Columbia Attorney General. Date of Service Upon District of Columbia Attorney General 3/18/2022. ( Answer due for ALL D.C. DEFENDANTS by 4/8/2022.) (Tolchin, Edward)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to District of Columbia Attorney General, and the District of Columbia Mayor. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zeg)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (znmg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9093787) filed by ALLIED TELECOM GROUP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Tolchin, Edward)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ALLIED TELECOM GROUP, LLC v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Not classified by court: ALLIED TELECOM GROUP, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Edward J. Tolchin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Not classified by court: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
