JAMES MADISON PROJECT et al v. OFFICE OF DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
| JAMES MADISON PROJECT and BRIAN J. KAREM |
| OFFICE OF DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE and OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE |
| 1:2022cv00674 |
| March 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Trevor N McFadden |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Bradley Prescott Moss on behalf of JAMES MADISON PROJECT, BRIAN J. KAREM (Moss, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zeg)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 3/11/2022. (lctnm2)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (znmg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9097338) filed by JAMES MADISON PROJECT, BRIAN J. KAREM. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons - ODNI, #3 Summons Summons - AG, #4 Summons Summons - USAO DC)(Zaid, Mark)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
