MALIK v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
ADAM MALIK |
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, CHRIS MAGNUS, Director UR JADDOU, TAE JOHNSON, DAVID FERRIERO, CHRISTOPHER WRAY and UR MENDOZA JADDOU |
1:2022cv00698 |
March 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Christopher R Cooper |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MINUTE ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time For Filing Answer, Nunc Pro Tunc. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by May 23, 2022. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 5/5/2022. (lccrc2) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond by FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, DAVID FERRIERO, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, TAE JOHNSON, CHRIS MAGNUS, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, CHRISTOPHER WRAY. (Moustakas, John) |
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION served on 3/21/2022; DAVID FERRIERO served on 3/18/2022; UR MENDOZA JADDOU served on 3/22/2022; TAE JOHNSON served on 3/22/2022; CHRIS MAGNUS served on 3/24/2022; ADAM MALIK served on 3/24/2022; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS served on 3/21/2022; NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION served on 3/18/2022; U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES served on 3/22/2022; U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION served on 3/21/2022; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY served on 3/22/2022; U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT served on 3/22/2022; CHRISTOPHER WRAY served on 3/21/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Receipt)(Elmazi, Blerim) |
Filing 4 ENTERED IN ERROR.....SUMMONS (14) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmh) Modified on 3/24/2022 (znmw). |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #3 Request for Summons to Issue; emailed to blerim@elmazilaw.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Missing/incorrect summonses. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to issue., 2. Please use the FOIA summons at https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/sites/dcd/files/Summons-FOIA_2013_FILL.pdf (zsb, ) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by ADAM MALIK.(Elmazi, Blerim) |
Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (zmh) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #2 Request for Summons to Issue; emailed to blerim@elmazilaw.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Missing summonses-government. When naming a government agent or agency as a defendant, you must supply a summons for each defendant & two additional summonses for the U.S. Attorney & U.S. Attorney General. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to Issue. (zmh, ) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by ADAM MALIK.(Elmazi, Blerim) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9102082) filed by ADAM MALIK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Elmazi, Blerim) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.