ROW 1 INC. v. BECERRA et al
ROW 1 INC. doing business as REGENATIVE LABS |
XAVIER BECERRA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, NORIDIAN HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, WISCONSIN PHYSICIANS SERVICE INSURANCE CORPORATION, NOVITAS SOLUTIONS, INC., NATIONAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC., CGS ADMINISTRATORS, LLC, PALMETTO GBA, LLC and FIRST COAST SERVICE OPTIONS, INC. |
1:2022cv00718 |
March 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Amit P Mehta |
Contract: Recovery Medicare |
05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 5/17/2022, (zjch, ) |
Filing 14 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint by NORIDIAN HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bucher, Kathryn) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathryn Bucher on behalf of NORIDIAN HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, LLC (Bucher, Kathryn) (Main Document 13 replaced on 4/11/2022) (zjf). |
MINUTE ORDER granting #14 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond. Defendant Noridian Healthcare Solutions, LLC shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint by May 17, 2022. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 4/8/2022. (lcapm1) |
Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer, Move or Respond to the Complaint by WISCONSIN PHYSICIANS SERVICE INSURANCE CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Evans, Lauren) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren H. Evans on behalf of WISCONSIN PHYSICIANS SERVICE INSURANCE CORPORATION (Evans, Lauren) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond. Defendant Wisconsin Physician Services Insurance Corporation shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by May 20, 2022. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 4/7/2022. (lcapm1) |
MINUTE ORDER granting Federal Defendants' #10 Consent Motion to Hold Preliminary Injunction Motion in Abeyance. Plaintiff's #3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is hereby held in abeyance pending the parties' further notice of whether the agency's rescinding of the challenged action renders this matter moot. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 3/27/2022. (lcapm1) |
Filing 10 Consent MOTION to Hold in Abeyance Holding Preliminary Injunction Motion in Abeyance by XAVIER BECERRA, CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Valdivia, Diana) Modified event on 3/28/2022 (znmw). |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOOTNESS by XAVIER BECERRA, CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Valdivia, Diana) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Diana Viggiano Valdivia on behalf of XAVIER BECERRA, CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES (Valdivia, Diana) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS (13) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmh) |
Filing 6 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE re Notice of QC- New Case,, #1 Complaint,, filed by ROW 1 INC.. Related document: Notice of QC- New Case,, #1 Complaint,, filed by REGENATIVE LABS, ROW 1 INC.. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Pandya, Brian) |
Filing 5 ERRATA Complaint (Caption Corrected per instructions from Clerk's Office) by ROW 1 INC. re #1 Complaint,, filed by REGENATIVE LABS, ROW 1 INC.. (Pandya, Brian) |
Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (zmh) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to bhpandya@duanemorris.com, cc'd 3 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata., 2. Missing summonses-government. When naming a government agent or agency as a defendant, you must supply a summons for each defendant & two additional summonses for the U.S. Attorney & U.S. Attorney General. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to Issue., 3. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zmh, ) |
Filing 4 DECLARATION of Tyler Barrett by Row 1, Inc. d/b/a Regenative Labs re #3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Row 1, Inc. d/b/a Regenative Labs. (Pandya, Brian) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Row 1, Inc. d/b/a Regenative Labs. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H)(Pandya, Brian) |
Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by Row 1, Inc. d/b/a Regenative Labs (Pandya, Brian) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9106438) filed by Row 1, Inc. d/b/a Regenative Labs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Summons HHS, #8 Summons CMS, #9 Summons CGS, #10 Summons Hon. Brooks-Lasure, #11 Summons First Coast, #12 Summons Hon. Becerra, #13 Summons National Government Services, #14 Summons Noridian, #15 Summons Novitas, #16 Summons Palmetto, #17 Summons Wisconsin Physicians Service)(Pandya, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.