PROTECT THE PUBLIC'S TRUST v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
| PROTECT THE PUBLIC'S TRUST |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION |
| 1:2022cv00757 |
| March 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall meet, confer, and jointly submit a proposed briefing schedule on or before May 30, 2022. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 5/15/2022. (lcrc2)
|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.(Moustakas, John) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmh) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zmh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PROTECT THE PUBLIC'S TRUST United States Department of Transportation ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9113075) filed by PROTECT THE PUBLIC'S TRUST. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - FOIA 2021-281, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Summons -- U.S. Attorney's Office, #4 Summons Summons -- U.S. Attorney General, #5 Summons Summons - Department of Transportation General Counsel)(Lawkowski, Gary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
