ANTINUCCI v. PAUL et al
Plaintiff: DOMINIC J. ANTINUCCI
Defendant: MARILYN NICOLE PAUL and JAMI BAILEY
Case Number: 1:2022cv00847
Filed: March 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Thomas F Hogan
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss or MOTION to Stay by JAMI BAILEY, MARILYN NICOLE PAUL. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A - Delaware Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Delaware Counterclaim, #4 Exhibit C - Amended Del Complaint, #5 Exhibit D - DC Complaint)(Dickieson, David). Added MOTION to Stay on 5/19/2022 (zeg).
April 22, 2022 Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendants' Answer due by 5/19/2022. (zalh)
April 21, 2022 Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint by JAMI BAILEY, MARILYN NICOLE PAUL. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dickieson, David)
April 21, 2022 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: GRANTING #4 Defendants' Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendants shall respond to the Complaint on or before May 19, 2022. Signed by Judge Thomas F. Hogan on April 21, 2022. (RLG).
April 12, 2022 Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. MARILYN NICOLE PAUL served on 4/7/2022, answer due 4/28/2022 (rj)
April 1, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmh)
April 1, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Thomas F. Hogan. (zmh)
March 31, 2022 NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to ksperduto@stglawdc.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Filing fee not paid. Please remit payment using the event Payment of Fee-Complaint., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zmh, )
March 31, 2022 Payment for #1 Complaint,. ($402; Receipt number ADCDC-9141447). (Sperduto, Kim)
March 29, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by Dominic J Antinucci. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits to Verified Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Sperduto, Kim)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ANTINUCCI v. PAUL et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DOMINIC J. ANTINUCCI
Represented By: Kim Hoyt Sperduto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARILYN NICOLE PAUL
Represented By: David H Dickieson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMI BAILEY
Represented By: David H Dickieson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?