GRIMM v. PNC BANK, N. A.
Bernard Grimm, In His Personal Capacity, and d/b/a The Law Office of Bernard S Grimm and BERNARD GRIMM In His Personal Capacity doing business as LAW OFFICE OF BERNARD S. GRIMM |
PNC BANK, N. A. |
1:2022cv01006 |
April 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Florence Y Pan |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #9 MOTION to Dismiss The Complaint In Its Entirety and to Strike The Jury Demand Relating To Plaintiffs Business Accounts MOTION to Strike by PNC BANK, N. A.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Sadler, Jessica) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #11 Consent Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's #9 Motion to Dismiss is due by July 5, 2022. Defendant's Reply is due by July 26, 2022. Signed by Judge Florence Y. Pan on 6/8/22. (lcaa) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Response due by 7/5/2022. Reply due by 7/26/2022. (zacr) |
Filing 10 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by PNC BANK, N. A. (Sadler, Jessica) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss The Complaint In Its Entirety and MOTION to Strike the Jury Demand Relating To Plaintiffs Business Accounts by PNC BANK, N. A. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(Sadler, Jessica). Added MOTION to Strike on 6/7/2022 (zjf). |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by John Darren Sadler on behalf of PNC BANK, N. A. (Sadler, John) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against PNC BANK, N. A. with Jury Demand filed by BERNARD GRIMM.(Coburn, Barry) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by PNC BANK, N. A.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Sadler, Jessica) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 6/6/2022. (zacr) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #6 Consent Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant's response to the #1 Complaint is due on June 6, 2022. Signed by Judge Florence Y. Pan on 4/27/2022. (lcsw) |
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. PNC BANK, N. A. served on 4/14/2022, answer due 5/5/2022 (Coburn, Barry) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Florence Y. Pan on 4/13/22. (lcaa) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to PNC BANK, N. A.. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmh) |
Case Assigned to Judge Florence Y. Pan. (zmh) |
Filing 2 ERRATA (Signed Civil Cover Sheet) by BERNARD GRIMM re #1 Complaint, filed by BERNARD GRIMM. (Coburn, Barry) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to barry@coburngreenbaum.com, cc'd 1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. No signature. Please file the signed document using the event Errata. All filings must have an original signature or '/s/ Attorney Name' to represent an electronic signature of the filer., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zmh, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PNC BANK, N. A. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9164624) filed by Bernard Grimm, In His Personal Capacity, and d/b/a The Law Office of Bernard S Grimm. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Coburn, Barry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.