CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE et al
| CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY |
| UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE and OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY |
| 1:2022cv01200 |
| April 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| James E Boasberg |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE.(Silverman, Bradley) |
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING Consent #8 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court ORDERS that Defendants shall file an Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by June 29, 2022. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 6/16/2022. (lcjeb2)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 6/29/2022 (lsj) |
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE. (Silverman, Bradley) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradley Silverman on behalf of All Defendants (Silverman, Bradley) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY served on 5/16/2022; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE served on 5/16/2022; U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE served on 5/16/2022, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 5/16/2022., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 5/16/2022. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 6/15/2022.) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service Proof of Service to Federal Defendants, U.S. Attorney General, and U.S. Attorney)(Kurose, Stephanie) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie Kurose on behalf of CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY (Kurose, Stephanie) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsb) |
|
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Stephanie Kurose. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a) #Click for instructions. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 5/3/2022. (lcjeb2)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge James E. Boasberg. (zsb) |
| Filing 3 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY (zsb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Stephanie Kurose, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-9205376. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Snape, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9205250) filed by CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Interior, #3 Summons AG, #4 Summons FWS, #5 Summons USADC, #6 Summons USDA, #7 Declaration Corporate Disclosure Certificate)(Snape, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
