KOUL v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
| ARKI KOUL |
| UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, TRACY RENAUD, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS |
| 1:2022cv01222 |
| May 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Beryl A Howell |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by ARKI KOUL (Kozar, Mika) |
MINUTE ORDER (paperless) DISMISSING this matter, without prejudice, pursuant to plaintiff's #8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on May 13, 2022. (lcbah1)
|
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 5/5/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 7/4/2022. (Kozar, Mika) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 05/09/2022. (Kozar, Mika) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UR MENDOZA JADDOU served on 5/6/2022; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS served on 5/6/2022; TRACY RENAUD served on 5/6/2022; UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES served on 5/6/2022; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY served on 5/6/2022 (Kozar, Mika) |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE TO ORDER OF THE COURT re Order by ARKI KOUL. (Kozar, Mika) Modified docket event/text on 5/9/2022 (zeg). |
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on May 4, 2022. (lcbah1)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff's response to Order of the Court due by 12 PM on 5/9/2022. (ztg) |
|
MINUTE ORDER (paperless) DIRECTING plaintiff, by 12 PM on May 9, 2022, (1) to refile her #1 Petition for Mandamus and Complaint for Injunctive Relief in compliance with L. Civ. R. 65.1(c), which requires that "[a]n application for a preliminary injunction shall be made in a document separate from the complaint," and (2) to confer with defendants and jointly submit to the Court a proposed schedule for briefing on plaintiff's anticipated motion for preliminary injunction. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on May 4, 2022. (lcbah1)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (7) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell. (znmg) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, TRACY RENAUD, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9208675) filed by ARKI KOUL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Summons (USCIS), #11 Summons (Ur Mendoza Jaddou), #12 Summons (Tracy Renaud), #13 Summons (Alejandro Mayorkas), #14 Summons (USDHS), #15 Summons (Attorney General of the United States), #16 Summons (US Attorney for District of Columbia))(Kozar, Mika) Modified event title on 5/12/2022 (znmw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
