ADAMS v. GARLAND
Plaintiff: Chance Adams
Defendant: MERRICK GARLAND and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Case Number: 1:2022cv01243
Filed: May 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Christopher R Cooper
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2022 Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 6/16/22. (Whitehead, Jack)
June 24, 2022 Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 6/9/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 8/8/2022. (Whitehead, Jack)
May 5, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to MERRICK GARLAND, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zjm)
May 5, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE re #2 Complaint filed by CHANCE ADAMS. Related document: #2 Complaint filed by CHANCE ADAMS. (Attachments: #1 Summons US Attorney, District of Columbia)(Whitehead, Jack)
May 5, 2022 Filing 2 ERRATA in re #1 COMPLAINT against MERRICK GARLAND with Jury Demand filed by CHANCE ADAMS.(Whitehead, Jack) Modified on 5/5/2022 to edit docket text (zjm).
May 5, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (zjm)
May 5, 2022 NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to teamwhitehead@whitehead-law.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata., 2. Missing summonses-government. When naming a government agent or agency as a defendant, you must supply a summons for each defendant & two additional summonses for the U.S. Attorney & U.S. Attorney General. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to Issue., 3. Please fill out the name and address for each defendant on the summons., 4. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (znmg, )
May 4, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MERRICK GARLAND with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number CDCDC-9215561) filed by Chance Adams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Whitehead, Jack)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ADAMS v. GARLAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chance Adams
Represented By: Jack K Whitehead
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MERRICK GARLAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MERRICK B. GARLAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?