KIM v. HERRUP et al
| JAE MAN KIM |
| ANDREW R. HERRUP and RICHARD C. VISEK |
| 1:2022cv01281 |
| May 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Tanya S Chutkan |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr on behalf of All Defendants (Molina, Ernesto) |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 5/19/2022. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 7/18/2022.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANDREW R. HERRUP served on 5/19/2022; RICHARD C. VISEK served on 5/19/2022, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 5/19/2022. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to ANDREW R. HERRUP, RICHARD C. VISEK, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zjm) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (zjm) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9229864) filed by JAE MAN KIM. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
