DUNLAP v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
| JERMAINE JOSEPH DUNLAP |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA |
| 1:2022cv01297 |
| May 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 05/27/2022. (zmh)
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 05/27/2022. (zmh) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JERMAINE JOSEPH DUNLAP. (zmh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA filed by JERMAINE JOSEPH DUNLAP. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(zmh) Modified on 5/31/2022 to modify pleading type (zmh). |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 05/06/2022. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
