RIVERA v. FARMERS INSURANCE et al
| JESSICA RIVERA |
| FARMERS INSURANCE doing business as TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE doing business as FARMERS GENERAL INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. and JOHN DOE |
| 1:2022cv01375 |
| May 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Timothy J Kelly |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by FARMERS INSURANCE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Giroux, Danielle) |
| Filing 5 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by FARMERS INSURANCE (Giroux, Danielle) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by FARMERS INSURANCE.(Giroux, Danielle) |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. FARMERS INSURANCE served on 6/10/2022, answer due 7/1/2022 (Lagan, Emily) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to FARMERS INSURANCE. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmh) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly. (zmh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9246597) filed by JESSICA RIVERA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Regan, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.