VUYYURU v. REDDY et al
| LOKESH VUYYURU |
| Y.S. JAGAN MOHAN REDDY, NARENDRA DAMODAR MODI, GOWTHAM ADANI, KLAUS SCHWAB, DWIVEDI, SUNIL ARORA, K. VIJAY SAI REDDY, SAJJALA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, LAVASA, RAJAT KUMAR and JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS 1 TO 5 |
| 1:2022cv01453 |
| May 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Timothy J Kelly |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to GOWTHAM ADANI served on 8/4/2022, answer due 10/3/2022; SUNIL ARORA served on 8/4/2022, answer due 10/3/2022; DWIVEDI served on 8/4/2022, answer due 10/3/2022; RAJAT KUMAR served on 8/4/2022, answer due 10/3/2022; LAVASA served on 8/4/2022, answer due 10/3/2022; NARENDRA DAMODAR MODI served on 8/4/2022, answer due 10/3/2022; K. VIJAY SAI REDDY served on 8/4/2022, answer due 10/3/2022; SAJJALA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY served on 8/4/2022, answer due 10/3/2022; Y.S. JAGAN MOHAN REDDY served on 8/4/2022, answer due 10/3/2022; KLAUS SCHWAB served on 8/4/2022, answer due 10/3/2022. (ztth)
|
|
Filing 5
ENTERED IN ERROR.....AFFIDAVIT of Mailing by LOKESH VUYYURU. (ztth); refiled as docket entry 6]; Modified on 8/30/2022 (ztth).
|
|
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's #4 Motion for CM/ECF Access. Local Civil Rule 5.4(b)(2) requires a pro se party requesting a CM/ECF account to file a motion entitled "Motion for CM/ECF User Name and Password," describing the party's access to the internet, confirming the capacity to file documents and receive filings electronically on a regular basis, and certifying that he or she either has successfully completed the entire Clerk's Office online tutorial or has been permitted to file electronically in other federal courts. See LCvR 5.4(b)(2). Plaintiff's motion explains that he has completed the online tutorial but does not describe his internet access or describe his capacity to file documents electronically. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's #4 motion is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 7/22/2022. (lctjk3)
|
|
Summons (10) Issued as to GOWTHAM ADANI, SUNIL ARORA, DWIVEDI, RAJAT KUMAR, LAVASA, NARENDRA DAMODAR MODI, K. VIJAY SAI REDDY, SAJJALA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, Y.S. JAGAN MOHAN REDDY, KLAUS SCHWAB. (zsb)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for CM/ECF Password by LOKESH VUYYURU. (ztth)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by LOKESH VUYYURU; plaintiff to provide summonses for issuance. (ztth) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/22/2022: #1 Summons) (zsb).
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 6/1/2022. (lctjk3)
|
|
Summons (10) Issued as to GOWTHAM ADANI, SUNIL ARORA, DWIVEDI, RAJAT KUMAR, LAVASA, NARENDRA DAMODAR MODI, K. VIJAY SAI REDDY, SAJJALA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, Y.S. JAGAN MOHAN REDDY, KLAUS SCHWAB. (zsb)
|
|
SUMMONS Not Issued as to GOWTHAM ADANI, SUNIL ARORA, DWIVEDI, RAJAT KUMAR, LAVASA, NARENDRA DAMODAR MODI, K. VIJAY SAI REDDY, SAJJALA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, Y.S. JAGAN MOHAN REDDY, KLAUS SCHWAB. (ztth)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against GOWTHAM ADANI, SUNIL ARORA, DWIVEDI, JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS 1 TO 5, RAJAT KUMAR, LAVASA, NARENDRA DAMODAR MODI, K. VIJAY SAI REDDY, SAJJALA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, Y.S. JAGAN MOHAN REDDY, KLAUS SCHWAB ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 202217) with Jury Demand filed by LOKESH VUYYURU. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ztth)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
