WASHINGTON v. DAVIS
JAMELIA WASHINGTON |
MARCIA DAVIS |
1:2022cv01467 |
May 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Tanya S Chutkan |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Response due by 8/5/2022. (tb) |
Filing 8 FOX NEAL ORDER advising Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #7 by 8/5/22 or Court may deem matter as conceded. Plaintiff's response shall be limited to ten pages. Failure to adhere to the court's Local Rules, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or any orders of this court may result in sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this action. The clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff at her address of record. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 7/7/22. (DJS) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by United States of America by MARCIA DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service)(Yee, Marsha) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Marsha Wellknown Yee on behalf of MARCIA DAVIS (Yee, Marsha) |
Filing 5 Receipt on 6/2/2022 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number 2021 CA 004773 B. (znmw) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against MARCIA DAVIS filed by JAMELIA WASHINGTON.(znmw) |
Filing 3 ORDER: Advising pro se Plaintiff of her obligation to follow the FRCP, Local Rules and orders of the court, including rules regarding service of process. Failure to adhere to these rules or orders may result in sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this action. The Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this order to : JAMELIA WASHINGTON, 1120 Barnaby Terr. SE, Washington, DC 20032 (See order for further details). Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 5/27/22. (DJS) |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmh) |
MINUTE ORDER: The Clerk of the court shall docket a copy of the Complaint as a separate ECF entry. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 5/27/22. (DJS) |
Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (zmh) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the District of Columbia, case number 2021 CA 004773 B (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by MARCIA DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Complaint), #2 Exhibit B (Westfall Certification), #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Service)(Yee, Marsha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: WASHINGTON v. DAVIS | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: JAMELIA WASHINGTON | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MARCIA DAVIS | |
Represented By: | Marsha Wellknown Yee |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.