SULAIMAN et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
| NIDAL AHMED SULAIMAN, FALASTIN GHUNAIM, MOHAMMED GHUNAIM, MAJED GHUNAIM and ANAS GHUNAIM |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, IAN G BROWNLEE, WENDY RUTH SHERMAN, CATHERINE BARRY, MICHAEL RATNEY, UNITED STATES EMBASSY IN JERUSALEM, ISRAEL and CHRISTINE PARKER |
| 1:2022cv01507 |
| May 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Christopher R Cooper |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to answer to the complaint by CATHERINE BARRY, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, IAN G BROWNLEE, CHRISTINE PARKER, MICHAEL RATNEY, WENDY RUTH SHERMAN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES EMBASSY IN JERUSALEM, ISRAEL. (Bashyrov, Jacob) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr on behalf of ANTONY J. BLINKEN (Molina, Ernesto) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob A. Bashyrov on behalf of CATHERINE BARRY, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, IAN G BROWNLEE, CHRISTINE PARKER, MICHAEL RATNEY, WENDY RUTH SHERMAN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES EMBASSY IN JERUSALEM, ISRAEL (Bashyrov, Jacob) |
| Filing 12 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 6/6/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 8/5/2022. (Jubran, Lewis) |
| Filing 11 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE served on 6/8/2022 (Jubran, Lewis) |
| Filing 10 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. WENDY RUTH SHERMAN served on 6/6/2022 (Jubran, Lewis) |
| Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. MICHAEL RATNEY served on 6/6/2022 (Jubran, Lewis) |
| Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. CHRISTINE PARKER served on 6/6/2022 (Jubran, Lewis) |
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNITED STATES EMBASSY IN JERUSALEM, ISRAEL served on 6/6/2022 (Jubran, Lewis) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. IAN G BROWNLEE served on 6/6/2022 (Jubran, Lewis) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANTONY J. BLINKEN served on 6/6/2022 (Jubran, Lewis) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. CATHERINE BARRY served on 6/6/2022 (Jubran, Lewis) |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 06/06/2022. (Jubran, Lewis) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (10) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmh) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (zmh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9269162) filed by MOHAMMED GHUNAIM, FALASTIN GHUNAIM, MAJED GHUNAIM, NIDAL AHMED SULAIMAN, ANAS GHUNAIM. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons)(Jubran, Lewis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
