GASTONG v. SCOTT et al
| HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV |
| MONIQUE M SCOTT, ANDREW H WARREN, JULIEANNE M HOLT, AGENTS ACCESSORIES COMPANIONS, MONIQUE M. SCOTT, ANDREW H. WARREN and JULIEANNE M. HOLT |
| 1:2022cv01635 |
| June 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #3 Pro Se Order Directing Prisoner Statement, Sent to HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV; New Address: Unknown. (zmh) |
Filing 3
PRO SE ORDER directing within 30 days of this Order, plaintiff shall provide a six month trust fund prisoner account statement and failure to comply will result in dismissal of case without prejudice. Plaintiff shall provide the requested information specific within this order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on 06/17/2022. (zmh)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV. (fb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against All Defendants by HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV.(fb) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 6/6/22. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (fb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
