SHAKUR v. WARDEN
| COCHISE AMARI SHAKUR |
| WARDEN |
| 1:2022cv01669 |
| June 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Prisoner Petition: General (Habeas Corpus) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER directing respondent to show cause why writ of habeas corpus should not issue and directing the U.S. Marshals to effect service. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 7/28/2022. (lcrc2)
|
|
Filing fee received: $ 5, receipt number: 202445. (zsb)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zsb)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER. Parties instituting a civil action in federal court are required to pay the applicable filing fee, 28 U.S.C. 1914(a), unless granted in forma pauperis (IFP) status under 1915. In this action for a writ of habeas corpus, the Petitioner has neither paid the $5 filing fee nor requested leave to proceed IFP. Accordingly, Petitioner has 30 days from the date of this order to either pay the $5 filing fee or apply for IFP status. Petitioner's failure to do either within the time provided will result in dismissal of the case without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall enclose with this order the short form IFP application for prisoners. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on 6/27/2022. (psu1)
|
|
Filing 5
Case transferred in from District of Virginia Eastern; Case Number 1:22-cv-00628. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
|
|
Filing 4
ORDERED that this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (see Order for details). Signed by District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr on 6/9/2022. (kgall) (C/S to plaintiff) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 6/10/2022.]
|
|
Case transferred to United States District Court for the District of Of Columbia. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (kgall) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 6/10/2022.]
|
|
Filing 3
Acknowledgment of Receipt. (kgall) (C/M to plaintiff with IFP form) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 6/10/2022.]
|
|
Filing 2
Memorandum of Law in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) filed by Cochise Amari Shakur. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(kgall) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 6/10/2022.]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Cochise Amari Shakur. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Data Sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(kgall) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 6/10/2022.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SHAKUR v. WARDEN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: COCHISE AMARI SHAKUR | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WARDEN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
